On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:24 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2019 12:59:27 AM CEST Dan Williams wrote:
> > As a single source file object there is no need for the hmat enabling to
> > have its own directory.
>
> Well, I asked Keith to add that directory as the code in hmat.c is more related to mm than to
> the rest of the ACPI subsystem.
...but hmat/hmat.c does not say anything about mm?
> Is there any problem with retaining it?
It feels redundant for no benefit to type hmat/hmat.c. How about create:
drivers/acpi/numa/ or drivers/acpi/mm/
...and move numa.c and hmat.c there if you want to separate mm
concerns from the rest of drivers/acpi/?
