On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:59:26 -0700 Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:46 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki < > kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From this, I feel I need to use unbound workqueue. BTW, with patches for > > current thread pool model, I think starvation problem by dirty pages > > cannot be seen. > > Anyway, I'll give a try. > > > > Then do you suggest me to wait for your patch for my next post? > I used most of weekend for background reclaim on workqueue and I changed many things based on your patch (but dropped most of kswapd descriptor...patches.) I'll post it today after some tests on machines in my office. It worked well on my laptop. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>