On Tue 28-05-19 23:38:11, Hillf Danton wrote: > > On Tue, 28 May 2019 20:39:36 +0800 Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:15:23PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > < snip > > > > > > > + orig_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); > > > > > > + for (pte = orig_pte; addr < end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) { > > > > > > > > > > s/end/next/ ? > > > > > > > > Why do you think it should be next? > > > > > > > Simply based on the following line, and afraid that next != end > > > > > > + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end); > > > > pmd_addr_end will return smaller address so end is more proper. > > > Fair. > > > > > > > +static long madvise_cool(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > > > > > + unsigned long start_addr, unsigned long end_addr) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; > > > > > > + struct mmu_gather tlb; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED|VM_HUGETLB|VM_PFNMAP)) > > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > No service in case of VM_IO? > > > > > > > > I don't know VM_IO would have regular LRU pages but just follow normal > > > > convention for DONTNEED and FREE. > > > > Do you have anything in your mind? > > > > > > > I want to skip a mapping set up for DMA. > > > > What you meant is those pages in VM_IO vma are not in LRU list? > > What I concern is the case that there are IO pages on lru list. > > Or > > pages in the vma are always pinned so no worth to deactivate or reclaim? > > > I will not be nervous or paranoid if they are pinned. > > In short, I prefer to skip IO mapping since any kind of address range > can be expected from userspace, and it may probably cover an IO mapping. > And things can get out of control, if we reclaim some IO pages while > underlying device is trying to fill data into any of them, for instance. What do you mean by IO pages why what is the actual problem? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs