On Tue 28-05-19 05:18:48, Daniel Colascione wrote: [...] > The important requirement, I think, is that we need to support > managing "memory-naive" uncooperative tasks (perhaps legacy ones > written before cross-process memory management even became possible), > and I think that the cooperative-vs-uncooperative distinction matters > a lot more than the tgid of the thread doing the memory manipulation. > (Although in our case, we really do need a separate tgid. :-)) Agreed here and that requires some sort of revalidation and failure on "object has changed" in one form or another IMHO. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
