Re: [PATCH -mm] mm, swap: Simplify total_swapcache_pages() with get_swap_device()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Paul,

"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:27:14PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> total_swapcache_pages() may race with swapper_spaces[] allocation and
>> freeing.  Previously, this is protected with a swapper_spaces[]
>> specific RCU mechanism.  To simplify the logic/code complexity, it is
>> replaced with get/put_swap_device().  The code line number is reduced
>> too.  Although not so important, the swapoff() performance improves
>> too because one synchronize_rcu() call during swapoff() is deleted.
>
> I am guessing that total_swapcache_pages() is not used on any
> fastpaths, but must defer to others on this.  Of course, if the
> performance/scalability of total_swapcache_pages() is important,
> benchmarking is needed.

This patch is mostly about code cleanup instead of performance.  That
is, to make the code easier to be understand.

> But where do I find get_swap_device() and put_swap_device()?  I do not
> see them in current mainline.

They are not in mainline, but in -mm tree.  I should have made it more
clear.  Sorry about that.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux