On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:58 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:37 PM <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Device pages can be more than type MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC. > > > > Handle all device pages within release_pages() > > > > This was found via code inspection while determining if release_pages() > > and the new put_user_pages() could be interchangeable. > > > > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/swap.c | 7 +++---- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c > > index 3a75722e68a9..d1e8122568d0 100644 > > --- a/mm/swap.c > > +++ b/mm/swap.c > > @@ -739,15 +739,14 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) > > if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) > > continue; > > > > - /* Device public page can not be huge page */ > > - if (is_device_public_page(page)) { > > + if (is_zone_device_page(page)) { > > if (locked_pgdat) { > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&locked_pgdat->lru_lock, > > flags); > > locked_pgdat = NULL; > > } > > - put_devmap_managed_page(page); > > - continue; > > + if (put_devmap_managed_page(page)) > > This "shouldn't" fail, and if it does the code that follows might get > confused by a ZONE_DEVICE page. If anything I would make this a > WARN_ON_ONCE(!put_devmap_managed_page(page)), but always continue > unconditionally. As discussed offline, I'm wrong here. It needs to fall through to put_page_testzero() for the device-dax case, but perhaps a comment for the next time I forget that subtlety.