On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 17:53, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 5:43 PM Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/20/19 6:47 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > > +static void print_decoded_frame_descr(const char *frame_descr)
> > > +{
> > > + /*
> > > + * We need to parse the following string:
> > > + * "n alloc_1 alloc_2 ... alloc_n"
> > > + * where alloc_i looks like
> > > + * "offset size len name"
> > > + * or "offset size len name:line".
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + char token[64];
> > > + unsigned long num_objects;
> > > +
> > > + if (!tokenize_frame_descr(&frame_descr, token, sizeof(token),
> > > + &num_objects))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + pr_err("\n");
> > > + pr_err("this frame has %lu %s:\n", num_objects,
> > > + num_objects == 1 ? "object" : "objects");
> > > +
> > > + while (num_objects--) {
> > > + unsigned long offset;
> > > + unsigned long size;
> > > +
> > > + /* access offset */
> > > + if (!tokenize_frame_descr(&frame_descr, token, sizeof(token),
> > > + &offset))
> > > + return;
> > > + /* access size */
> > > + if (!tokenize_frame_descr(&frame_descr, token, sizeof(token),
> > > + &size))
> > > + return;
> > > + /* name length (unused) */
> > > + if (!tokenize_frame_descr(&frame_descr, NULL, 0, NULL))
> > > + return;
> > > + /* object name */
> > > + if (!tokenize_frame_descr(&frame_descr, token, sizeof(token),
> > > + NULL))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /* Strip line number, if it exists. */
> >
> > Why?
The filename is not included, and I don't think it adds much in terms
of ability to debug; nor is the line number included with all
descriptions. I think, the added complexity of separating the line
number and parsing is not worthwhile here. Alternatively, I could not
pay attention to the line number at all, and leave it as is -- in that
case, some variable names will display as "foo:123".
> >
> > > + strreplace(token, ':', '\0');
> > > +
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +
> > > + aligned_addr = round_down((unsigned long)addr, sizeof(long));
> > > + mem_ptr = round_down(aligned_addr, KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE);
> > > + shadow_ptr = kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)aligned_addr);
> > > + shadow_bottom = kasan_mem_to_shadow(end_of_stack(current));
> > > +
> > > + while (shadow_ptr >= shadow_bottom && *shadow_ptr != KASAN_STACK_LEFT) {
> > > + shadow_ptr--;
> > > + mem_ptr -= KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + while (shadow_ptr >= shadow_bottom && *shadow_ptr == KASAN_STACK_LEFT) {
> > > + shadow_ptr--;
> > > + mem_ptr -= KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > I suppose this won't work if stack grows up, which is fine because it grows up only on parisc arch.
> > But "BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACK_GROUWSUP))" somewhere wouldn't hurt.
> Note that KASAN was broken on parisc from day 1 because of other
> assumptions on the stack growth direction hardcoded into KASAN
> (e.g. __kasan_unpoison_stack() and __asan_allocas_unpoison()).
> So maybe this BUILD_BUG_ON can be added in a separate patch as it's
> not specific to what Marco is doing here?
Happy to send a follow-up patch, or add here. Let me know what you prefer.
Thanks,
-- Marco
