On Wed 15-05-19 11:41:14, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Ditto. Proper changelog or simply squash those patches into a single patch if you do not feel like copy&paste is fun > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > index 2bf210229daf..781879a91e3b 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > @@ -832,7 +832,10 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > > memset(&mss, 0, sizeof(mss)); > > - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > + ret = down_read_killable(&mm->mmap_sem); > + if (ret) > + goto out_put_mm; Why not ret = -EINTR. The seq_file code seems to be handling all errors AFAICS. > + > hold_task_mempolicy(priv); > > for (vma = priv->mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { > @@ -849,8 +852,9 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > > release_task_mempolicy(priv); > up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > - mmput(mm); > > +out_put_mm: > + mmput(mm); > out_put_task: > put_task_struct(priv->task); > priv->task = NULL; -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs