Some user who install SIGBUS handler that does longjmp out therefore keeping the process alive is confused by the error message "[188988.765862] Memory failure: 0x1840200: Killing cellsrv:33395 due to hardware memory corruption" Slightly modify the error message to improve clarity. Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/memory-failure.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index fc8b517..14de5e2 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -216,10 +216,9 @@ static int kill_proc(struct to_kill *tk, unsigned long pfn, int flags) short addr_lsb = tk->size_shift; int ret; - pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Killing %s:%d due to hardware memory corruption\n", - pfn, t->comm, t->pid); - if ((flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) && t->mm == current->mm) { + pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Killing %s:%d due to hardware memory " + "corruption\n", pfn, t->comm, t->pid); ret = force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, (void __user *)tk->addr, addr_lsb, current); } else { @@ -229,6 +228,8 @@ static int kill_proc(struct to_kill *tk, unsigned long pfn, int flags) * This could cause a loop when the user sets SIGBUS * to SIG_IGN, but hopefully no one will do that? */ + pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Sending SIGBUS to %s:%d due to hardware " + "memory corruption\n", pfn, t->comm, t->pid); ret = send_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AO, (void __user *)tk->addr, addr_lsb, t); /* synchronous? */ } -- 1.8.3.1