[PATCH] mm, memory-failure: clarify error message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some user who install SIGBUS handler that does longjmp out
therefore keeping the process alive is confused by the error
message
  "[188988.765862] Memory failure: 0x1840200: Killing
   cellsrv:33395 due to hardware memory corruption"
Slightly modify the error message to improve clarity.

Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index fc8b517..14de5e2 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -216,10 +216,9 @@ static int kill_proc(struct to_kill *tk, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
 	short addr_lsb = tk->size_shift;
 	int ret;
 
-	pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Killing %s:%d due to hardware memory corruption\n",
-		pfn, t->comm, t->pid);
-
 	if ((flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) && t->mm == current->mm) {
+		pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Killing %s:%d due to hardware memory "
+			"corruption\n", pfn, t->comm, t->pid);
 		ret = force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, (void __user *)tk->addr,
 				       addr_lsb, current);
 	} else {
@@ -229,6 +228,8 @@ static int kill_proc(struct to_kill *tk, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
 		 * This could cause a loop when the user sets SIGBUS
 		 * to SIG_IGN, but hopefully no one will do that?
 		 */
+		pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: Sending SIGBUS to %s:%d due to hardware "
+			"memory corruption\n", pfn, t->comm, t->pid);
 		ret = send_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AO, (void __user *)tk->addr,
 				      addr_lsb, t);  /* synchronous? */
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux