On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [Cc Suren and Minchan - the email thread starts here 20190514131654.25463-1-oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxx] > > On Wed 15-05-19 08:53:11, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > I will try to comment on the interface itself later. But I have to say > > that I am not impressed. Abusing sysfs for per process features is quite > > gross to be honest. > > I have already commented on this in other email. I consider sysfs an > unsuitable interface for per-process API. Wait, what? A new sysfs file/directory per process? That's crazy, no one must have benchmarked it :) And I agree, sysfs is not for that, please don't abuse it. Proc is for process apis. thanks, greg k-h