On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:21:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:50:28PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:09:29AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > Here's another update of this patch queue, hopefully with all wrinkles > > > ironed out now. > > > > > > Darrick, I think Linus would be unhappy seeing the first four patches in > > > the gfs2 tree; could you put them into the xfs tree instead like we did > > > some time ago already? > > > > Sure. When I'm done reviewing them I'll put them in the iomap tree, > > though, since we now have a separate one. :) > > I'd just keep the iomap stuff in the xfs tree as a separate set of > branches and merge them into the XFS for-next when composing it. > That way it still gets plenty of test coverage from all the XFS > devs and linux next without anyone having to think about. > > You really only need to send separate pull requests for the iomap > and XFS branches - IMO, there's no really need to have a complete > new tree for it... <nod> That was totally a braino on my part -- I put the patches in the iomap *branch* since now we have a separate *branch*. :) (and just merged that branch into for-next) --D > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
