On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:34:23AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > That part makes me think the best option is to make parisc do > CONFIG_NUMA as well regardless of the historical intent was. But it's not just parisc. It's six other architectures as well, some of which aren't even SMP. Does !SMP && NUMA make any kind of sense? I think really, this is just a giant horrible misunderstanding on the part of the MM people. There's no reason why an ARM chip with 16MB of memory at 0 and 16MB of memory at 1GB should be saddled with all the NUMA gunk. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>