Re: [HELP] OOM:Page allocation fragment issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:59 AM, TAO HU <tghk48@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi, All
>>
>> I got a issue that kmalloc() fails to allocate 32-K page while there
>> are still pretty much total memory available (60+MB).
>> Any suggestions? Any thing I can tune to reduced the failure cases?
>>
>> It happens with 2.6.35 kernel
>>
>> <4>[ 6232.631622] getevent invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=3, oom_adj=0
>> <4>[ 6232.639312] [<c0053230>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from
>> [<c0109a88>] (dump_header.clone.1+0x50/0x84)
>> <4>[ 6232.649597] [<c0109a88>] (dump_header.clone.1+0x50/0x84) from
>> [<c0109af0>] (oom_kill_process.clone.0+0x34/0xec)
>> <4>[ 6232.660705] [<c0109af0>] (oom_kill_process.clone.0+0x34/0xec)
>> from [<c0109d04>] (__out_of_memory+0x15c/0x184)
>> <4>[ 6232.671630] [<c0109d04>] (__out_of_memory+0x15c/0x184) from
>> [<c0109dc0>] (out_of_memory+0x94/0xd4)
>> <4>[ 6232.681488] [<c0109dc0>] (out_of_memory+0x94/0xd4) from
>> [<c010d474>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x6e8)
>> <4>[ 6232.692016] [<c010d474>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4c4/0x6e8)
>> from [<c0131fec>] (cache_grow.clone.0+0xac/0x3e4)
>> <4>[ 6232.703125] [<c0131fec>] (cache_grow.clone.0+0xac/0x3e4) from
>> [<c013334c>] (__kmalloc+0x3ec/0x6c4)
>> <4>[ 6232.712982] [<c013334c>] (__kmalloc+0x3ec/0x6c4) from
>> [<c0393f9c>] (evdev_open+0x94/0x1ec)
>> <4>[ 6232.722137] [<c0393f9c>] (evdev_open+0x94/0x1ec) from
>> [<c0390cac>] (input_open_file+0x184/0x2d8)
>> <4>[ 6232.731781] [<c0390cac>] (input_open_file+0x184/0x2d8) from
>> [<c013b668>] (chrdev_open+0x20c/0x234)
>> <4>[ 6232.741638] [<c013b668>] (chrdev_open+0x20c/0x234) from
>> [<c0136b80>] (__dentry_open+0x200/0x324)
>> <4>[ 6232.751281] [<c0136b80>] (__dentry_open+0x200/0x324) from
>> [<c0136d60>] (nameidata_to_filp+0x3c/0x50)
>> <4>[ 6232.761322] [<c0136d60>] (nameidata_to_filp+0x3c/0x50) from
>> [<c0142878>] (do_last+0x4c8/0x5ec)
>> <4>[ 6232.770782] [<c0142878>] (do_last+0x4c8/0x5ec) from [<c0144450>]
>> (do_filp_open+0x184/0x514)
>> <4>[ 6232.779937] [<c0144450>] (do_filp_open+0x184/0x514) from
>> [<c0136824>] (do_sys_open+0x58/0x18c)
>> <4>[ 6232.789428] [<c0136824>] (do_sys_open+0x58/0x18c) from
>> [<c004db20>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30)
>> <4>[ 6232.798980] Mem-info:
>> <4>[ 6232.801483] Normal per-cpu:
>> <4>[ 6232.804565] CPU Â Â0: hi: Â186, btch: Â31 usd: Â15
>> <4>[ 6232.809844] active_anon:34424 inactive_anon:36745 isolated_anon:3
>> <4>[ 6232.809875] Âactive_file:2 inactive_file:0 isolated_file:65
>> <4>[ 6232.809875] Âunevictable:95 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
>> <4>[ 6232.809906] Âfree:16133 slab_reclaimable:1274 slab_unreclaimable:3892
>> <4>[ 6232.809906] Âmapped:8809 shmem:263 pagetables:4657 bounce:0
>> <4>[ 6232.841766] Normal free:64532kB min:2884kB low:3604kB
>> high:4324kB active_anon:137696kB inactive_anon:146980kB
>> active_file:8kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:380kB
>
> There are lots of anon pages but few file pages.
>
>> isolated(anon):12kB isolated(file):260kB present:520192kB mlocked:0kB
>> dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:35236kB shmem:1052kB
>> slab_reclaimable:5096kB slab_unreclaimable:15568kB kernel_stack:6544kB
>> pagetables:18628kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB
>> pages_scanned:34 all_unreclaimable? no
>> <4>[ 6232.885314] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
>> <4>[ 6232.889190] Normal: 10659*4kB 2735*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB
>> 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 64532kB
>
> There isn't any pages of bigger 32K in your system.
> Memory fragmentation is high.
>
>> <4>[ 6232.901367] 397 total pagecache pages
>> <4>[ 6232.905395] 0 pages in swap cache
>> <4>[ 6232.909027] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
>> <4>[ 6232.914764] Free swap Â= 0kB
>> <4>[ 6232.917968] Total swap = 0kB
>
> You don't have swap so VM can't reclaim anon pages to get a contiguous page.
>
>> <4>[ 6232.945617] 131072 pages of RAM
>> <4>[ 6232.949127] 17229 free pages
>> <4>[ 6232.952270] 22953 reserved pages
>> <4>[ 6232.955810] 5166 slab pages
>> <4>[ 6232.958892] 123153 pages shared
>> <4>[ 6232.962341] 0 pages swap cached
>>
>
> It means your system has 512M but 68M is reserved.
> So you can use just 444M but anon is 278M. As I said, you can't
> reclaim anon paes.
> There is 67M free page but you can't use it as it's small pages but
> you want big page.
> slab : 20M page table : 18M kernel stack : 6M.
> So 278 + 67 + 20 + 18 + 6 = 389M.
> 512M - 68M = 444.
> Where is (444 - 389)?
> I guess 55M is used by device driver and kernel. It's not accountable
> in current kernel.
>
> Solution
> 1. use CONFIG_COMPACTION=y if you don't use.
> 2: consume small memory by application or device driver
> 3: use swap for reclaimaing anon pages
> 4 : buy bigger memory

One more solution is to use zram(Compressed RAM block device support)
device with swap. old name is compcache.
You can refer drivers/staging/zram

Good luck.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]