> On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 10:23 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > > > Which part of me telling you that you will break lots of other things in > > > > > the core kernel dont you get? > > > > > > > > I get that you tell me this ... however, the systems that, according to > > > > you, should be failing to get to boot prompt do, in fact, manage it. > > > > > > If you dont use certain subsystems then it may work. Also do you run with > > > debuggin on. > > > > > > The following patch is I think what would be needed to fix it. > > > > I'm worry about this patch. A lot of mm code assume !NUMA systems > > only have node 0. Not only SLUB. > > > > I'm not sure why this unfortunate mismatch occur. but I think DISCONTIG > > hacks makes less sense. Can we consider parisc turn NUMA on instead? > > Well, you mean a patch like this? It won't build ... obviously we need > some more machinery > > CC arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.s > In file included from include/linux/sched.h:78, > from arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:31: > include/linux/topology.h:212:2: error: #error Please define an appropriate SD_NODE_INIT in include/asm/topology.h!!! > In file included from include/linux/sched.h:78, > from arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:31: > include/linux/topology.h: In function 'numa_node_id': > include/linux/topology.h:255: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_to_node' Sorry about that. I'll see more carefully the code later. Probably long time discontig-mem uninterest made multiple level breakage. Grr. ;-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>