Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Proactive Memory Reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:08 AM Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 08:30 -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> > Topic: Proactive Memory Reclaim
> >
> > Motivation/Problem: Memory overcommit is most commonly used technique
> > to reduce the cost of memory by large infrastructure owners. However
> > memory overcommit can adversely impact the performance of latency
> > sensitive applications by triggering direct memory reclaim. Direct
> > reclaim is unpredictable and disastrous for latency sensitive
> > applications.
>
> This sounds similar to a project Johannes has
> been working on, except he is not tracking which
> memory is idle at all, but only the pressure on
> each cgroup, through the PSI interface:
>
> https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/psi/docs/overview
>
> Discussing the pros and cons, and experiences with
> both approaches seems like a useful topic. I'll add
> it to the agenda.

This topic sounds interesting and in line with some experiments being
done on Android. Looking forward to this discussion. CC'ing Android
folks that might be interested as well.

> --
> All Rights Reversed.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux