On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:50 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Shakeel, > > This sounds interesting. Actually, we have something similar designed > in-house (called "cold" page reclaim). But, we mainly targeted to cold > page cache rather than anonymous page for the time being, and it does > in cgroup scope. We are extending it to anonymous page now. > > Look forward to discussing with you. > Hi Yang, Thanks for the info. Is this per-cgroup "cold page reclaim" is triggered by the job themselves? Are the jobs trying to avoid memcg limit reclaim by proactively reclaiming their own memory? Shakeel
