On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > I do think SLUB have a number of pathological cases where SLAB is > faster. If was significantly more difficult to get good bulk-free > performance for SLUB. SLUB is only fast as long as objects belong to > the same page. To get good bulk-free performance if objects are > "mixed", I coded this[1] way-too-complex fast-path code to counter > act this (joined work with Alex Duyck). Right. SLUB usually compensates for that with superior allocation performance. > > It's, of course, worth thinking about other pathological cases too. > > Workloads that cause large allocations is one. Workloads that cause lots > > of slab cache shrinking is another. > > I also worry about long uptimes when SLUB objects/pages gets too > fragmented... as I said SLUB is only efficient when objects are > returned to the same page, while SLAB is not. ??? Why would SLUB pages get more fragmented? SLUB has fragmentation prevention methods that SLAB does not have.
