Re: [v2 RFC PATCH 0/9] Another Approach to Use PMEM as NUMA Node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/16/19 2:59 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> On 4/16/19 2:22 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> Keith Busch had a set of patches to let you specify the demotion order
>> via sysfs for fun.  The rules we came up with were:
>> 1. Pages keep no history of where they have been
>> 2. Each node can only demote to one other node
> 
> Does this mean any remote node? Or just DRAM to PMEM, but remote PMEM
> might be ok?

In Keith's code, I don't think we differentiated.  We let any node
demote to any other node you want, as long as it follows the cycle rule.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux