On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:22 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:08 PM Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:35 AM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:43 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I went ahead and acquired one of these boards to see if I can can > > > > > > debug this locally. > > > > > > > > > > Hi! Any progress on this? Might it be possible to unblock this series > > > > > for v5.2 by adding a temporary "not on ARM" flag? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone send me a pointer to the series in question ? I would like > > > > to run it through my testbed. > > > > > > It's already in -mm and linux-next (",mm: shuffle initial free memory > > > to improve memory-side-cache utilization") but it gets enabled with > > > CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y (which was made the default briefly in > > > -mm which triggered problems on ARM as was reverted). > > > > > > > Boot tests report > > > > Qemu test results: > > total: 345 pass: 345 fail: 0 > > > > This is on top of next-20190410 with CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y > > and the known crashes fixed. > > In addition to CONFIG_SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y you also need the > kernel command line option "page_alloc.shuffle=1" > > ...so I doubt you are running with shuffling enabled. Another way to > double check is: > > cat /sys/module/page_alloc/parameters/shuffle Yes, you are right. Because, with it enabled, I see: Kernel command line: rdinit=/sbin/init page_alloc.shuffle=1 panic=-1 console=ttyAMA0,115200 page_alloc.shuffle=1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at ./include/linux/jump_label.h:303 page_alloc_shuffle+0x12c/0x1ac static_key_enable(): static key 'page_alloc_shuffle_key+0x0/0x4' used before call to jump_label_init() Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.1.0-rc4-next-20190410-00003-g3367c36ce744 #1 Hardware name: ARM Integrator/CP (Device Tree) [<c0011c68>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000ec48>] (show_stack+0x10/0x18) [<c000ec48>] (show_stack) from [<c07e9710>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x24) [<c07e9710>] (dump_stack) from [<c001bb1c>] (__warn+0xe0/0x108) [<c001bb1c>] (__warn) from [<c001bb88>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x44/0x6c) [<c001bb88>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c0b0c4a8>] (page_alloc_shuffle+0x12c/0x1ac) [<c0b0c4a8>] (page_alloc_shuffle) from [<c0b0c550>] (shuffle_store+0x28/0x48) [<c0b0c550>] (shuffle_store) from [<c003e6a0>] (parse_args+0x1f4/0x350) [<c003e6a0>] (parse_args) from [<c0ac3c00>] (start_kernel+0x1c0/0x488) [<c0ac3c00>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) I'll re-run the test, but I suspect it will drown in warnings. Guenter