On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:09:56AM +0700, trong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Tri Vo <trong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Fixes: 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support")
>
> I think this is the wrong fix. Why not simply:
I spoke with Tri quickly about this proposal and we agree it's a better fix.
Andrew, would you mind dropping:
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/gcov-clang-support-fix.patch
?
Matthew, would you please send that patch with a commit message? Or
if you would prefer us to send with your suggested-by tag, we can do
that, too. Whichever you prefer, please let me know. Thanks for the
suggestion.
>
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -709,6 +709,11 @@ static inline bool is_module_text_address(unsigned long addr)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool within_module(unsigned long addr, const struct module *mod)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /* Get/put a kernel symbol (calls should be symmetric) */
> #define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak)); &(x); })
> #define symbol_put(x) do { } while (0)
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
