Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/3] mm/vmap: add DEBUG_AUGMENT_PROPAGATE_CHECK macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +#if DEBUG_AUGMENT_PROPAGATE_CHECK
> > +static void
> > +augment_tree_propagate_do_check(struct rb_node *n)
> > +{
> > +	struct vmap_area *va;
> > +	struct rb_node *node;
> > +	unsigned long size;
> > +	bool found = false;
> > +
> > +	if (n == NULL)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	va = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
> > +	size = va->subtree_max_size;
> > +	node = n;
> > +
> > +	while (node) {
> > +		va = rb_entry(node, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
> > +
> > +		if (get_subtree_max_size(node->rb_left) == size) {
> > +			node = node->rb_left;
> > +		} else {
> > +			if (__va_size(va) == size) {
> > +				found = true;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			node = node->rb_right;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!found) {
> > +		va = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
> > +		pr_emerg("tree is corrupted: %lu, %lu\n",
> > +			__va_size(va), va->subtree_max_size);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	augment_tree_propagate_do_check(n->rb_left);
> > +	augment_tree_propagate_do_check(n->rb_right);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void augment_tree_propagate_from_check(void)
> 
> Why do you need this intermediate function?
> 
> Other than that looks good to me, please free to use
> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> 
Will remove, we do not need that extra wrapper.

--
Vlad Rezki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux