On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 13:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > It took a bit of sleuthing to figure out that this patch applies to > Mike's "hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node specific > nr_hugepages". Should they be folded together? I'm thinking not. Sorry Andrew, I should have mentioned that this patch was based on Mike's "hugetlb fix potential over/underflow" patch. Given said that, I would keep the two patches separated, as that one is a fix, and this one is a cleanup. > (Also, should "hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node > specific nr_hugepages" have been -stableified? I also think not, but > I > bet it happens anyway). I am not sure of the consequences in older branches, but if it is not too much of a hassle, it might be worth? Mike might know better here. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3
