On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 06:05:38 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's regrettable that this fixes > > slob-respect-list_head-abstraction-layer.patch but doesn't apply to > > that patch - slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru.patch gets in the way. > > So we end up with a patch series which introduces a bug and later > > fixes it. > > Yes I thought that also. Do you rebase the mm tree? Did you apply this > right after slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru or to the current tip? After slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru.patch > If > it is applied to the tip does this effect the ability to later bisect in > between these two commits (if the need arises for some unrelated reason)? There is a bisection hole but it is short and the bug is hardish to hit. > > I guess we can live with that but if the need comes to respin this > > series, please do simply fix > > slob-respect-list_head-abstraction-layer.patch so we get a clean > > series. > > If its not too much work for you to apply the new series I'll do another > version just to get this right. I guess that would be best, thanks.
