The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2->v3:
Rename the parameter to 'start_section_nr' from 'sec'.
drivers/base/memory.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cb8347500ce2..9ea972b2ae79 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -231,13 +231,14 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long start_pfn)
* OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
*/
static int
-memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_type)
+memory_block_action(unsigned long start_section_nr, unsigned long action,
+ int online_type)
{
unsigned long start_pfn;
unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
int ret;
- start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
+ start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(start_section_nr);
switch (action) {
case MEM_ONLINE:
@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_t
break;
default:
WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
- "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
+ "%ld\n", __func__, start_section_nr, action, action);
ret = -EINVAL;
}
--
2.17.2
