Re: early_memtest() patterns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:39:14PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> early_memtest() is being executed on many platforms even though they dont enable
> CONFIG_MEMTEST by default. Just being curious how the following set of patterns
> got decided. Are they just random 64 bit patterns ? Or there is some particular
> significance to them in detecting bad memory.
> 
> static u64 patterns[] __initdata = {
>         /* The first entry has to be 0 to leave memtest with zeroed memory */
>         0,
>         0xffffffffffffffffULL,
>         0x5555555555555555ULL,
>         0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaULL,
>         0x1111111111111111ULL,
>         0x2222222222222222ULL,
>         0x4444444444444444ULL,
>         0x8888888888888888ULL,
>         0x3333333333333333ULL,
>         0x6666666666666666ULL,
>         0x9999999999999999ULL,
>         0xccccccccccccccccULL,
>         0x7777777777777777ULL,
>         0xbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbULL,
>         0xddddddddddddddddULL,
>         0xeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeULL,
>         0x7a6c7258554e494cULL, /* yeah ;-) */
> };
> 
> BTW what about the last one here.

It's 'LINUXrlz' ;-)
 
> - Anshuman
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux