Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > and I would like to know that you are >> > not just shifting the problem to a smaller unit and a new/creative HW >> > will force us to go even more complicated. >> >> HW will not do this to us. It's software that has the problem. >> Namespace creation is unnecessarily constrained to 128MB alignment. > > And why is that a problem? A lack of documentation that this is a > requirement? Something will not work with a larger alignment? Someting > else? See this email for one user-visible problem: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/x49imxbx22d.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Cheers, Jeff
