On 03/21/19 at 05:19am, William Kucharski wrote: > > > > On Mar 21, 2019, at 4:35 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I am sorry to be snarky but hasn't this generated way much more email > > traffic than it really deserves? A simply and trivial clean up in the > > beginning that was it, right? Yeah, I'd like to do like this. Will arrange patch and post a new version. Sorry about the mail bomb to CCed people. Yet I also would like to hear any suggestion from people who intend to improve. Discussions make me know more the status of errno than before. Thank you all for sharing. > > That's rather the point; that it did generate a fair amount of email > traffic indicates it's worthy of at least a passing mention in a > comment somewhere. We header files to put errno. Only changing in kernel may cause difference between it and userspace. I will list each returned value in code comment and tell what they are meaning in this function, that could be helpful. Thanks. usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h
