On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:23:03 +0530 Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > > @@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ static inline bool queue_pages_required(struct page *page, > > return node_isset(nid, *qp->nmask) == !(flags & MPOL_MF_INVERT); > > } > > > > +/* > > + * The queue_pages_pmd() may have three kind of return value. > > + * 1 - pages are placed on he right node or queued successfully. > > Minor typo -> s/he/the ? Yes, that comment needs some help. This? --- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-make-mbind-return-eio-when-mpol_mf_strict-is-specified-fix +++ a/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ static inline bool queue_pages_required( } /* - * The queue_pages_pmd() may have three kind of return value. - * 1 - pages are placed on he right node or queued successfully. - * 0 - THP get split. + * queue_pages_pmd() has three possible return values: + * 1 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully. + * 0 - THP was split. * -EIO - is migration entry or MPOL_MF_STRICT was specified and an existing * page was already on a node that does not follow the policy. */ _
