On 3/20/19 2:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 02:14:09AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >> On 3/20/19 1:06 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:46:09PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >>>> On 2/13/19 2:52 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:25:12PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> >>>>>> So really, it sounds like a low hanging fruit: we don't really need to >>>>>> write much more testing code code nor do we have to refactor existing >>>>>> test suites. We just need to make sure the right tests are running on >>>>>> stable kernels. I really want to clarify what each subsystem sees as >>>>>> "sufficient" (and have that documented somewhere). >>>>> >>>>> kernel.ci and 0-day and Linaro are starting to add the fs and mm tests >>>>> to their test suites to address these issues (I think 0-day already has >>>>> many of them). So this is happening, but not quite obvious. I know I >>>>> keep asking Linaro about this :( >>>> >>>> We're working on investments for LDCG[0] in 2019 that include kernel CI >>>> changes for server use cases. Please keep us informed of what you folks >>>> ultimately want to see, and I'll pass on to the steering committee too. >>>> >>>> Ultimately I've been pushing for a kernel 0-day project for Arm. That's >>>> probably going to require a lot of duplicated effort since the original >>>> 0-day project isn't open, but creating an open one could help everyone. >>> >>> Why are you trying to duplicate it on your own? That's what kernel.ci >>> should be doing, please join in and invest in that instead. It's an >>> open source project with its own governance and needs sponsors, why >>> waste time and money doing it all on your own? >> >> To clarify, I'm pushing for investment in kernel.ci to achieve that goal >> that it could provide the same 0-day capability for Arm and others. > > Great, that's what I was trying to suggest :) > >> It'll ultimately result in duplicated effort vs if 0-day were open. > > "Half" of 0-day is open, but it's that other half that is still > needed... ;) I'm hoping this might also help that to happen... Best, Jon.
