On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, John Hubbard wrote: > > > > My concerns do not affect this patchset which just marks the get/put for > > the pagecache. The problem was that the description was making claims that > > were a bit misleading and seemed to prescribe a solution. > > > > So lets get this merged. Whatever the solution will be, we will need this > > markup. > > > > Sounds good. Do you care to promote that thought into a formal ACK for me? :) Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
