On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:59:16 +0200, Phil Carmody wrote:
I'm just glad this wasn't an insta-nack, as I am quite a fan of consts, and hopefully something can be worked out.
I feel you man. Unfortunately, I think that const, since it's an after-thought, is not very usable in C. For instance, as you've pointed in your patch, the "_ro" suffix is sort of dumb, but without it compound_head would have to take const and return non-const (like strchr() does) which is kinda stupid as well. What's more, because of lack of encapsulation, âconst struct pageâ only means that the object is const but thighs it points to aren't. As such, const does not really play that well with structs anyway. const is, in my opinion, one of those things C++ actually got right (or close to right). -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxx>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href