On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:35:00 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:04 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <
> kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:54:20 -0700
> > Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > There is a kswapd kernel thread for each numa node. We will add a
> > different
> > > kswapd for each memcg. The kswapd is sleeping in the wait queue headed at
> > > kswapd_wait field of a kswapd descriptor. The kswapd descriptor stores
> > > information of node or memcg and it allows the global and per-memcg
> > background
> > > reclaim to share common reclaim algorithms.
> > >
> > > This patch adds the kswapd descriptor and moves the per-node kswapd to
> > use the
> > > new structure.
> > >
> >
> > No objections to your direction but some comments.
> >
> > > changelog v2..v1:
> > > 1. dynamic allocate kswapd descriptor and initialize the wait_queue_head
> > of pgdat
> > > at kswapd_run.
> > > 2. add helper macro is_node_kswapd to distinguish per-node/per-cgroup
> > kswapd
> > > descriptor.
> > >
> > > changelog v3..v2:
> > > 1. move the struct mem_cgroup *kswapd_mem in kswapd sruct to later patch.
> > > 2. rename thr in kswapd_run to something else.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 +-
> > > include/linux/swap.h | 7 ++++
> > > mm/page_alloc.c | 1 -
> > > mm/vmscan.c | 95
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > index 628f07b..6cba7d2 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > @@ -640,8 +640,7 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
> > > unsigned long node_spanned_pages; /* total size of physical page
> > > range, including holes */
> > > int node_id;
> > > - wait_queue_head_t kswapd_wait;
> > > - struct task_struct *kswapd;
> > > + wait_queue_head_t *kswapd_wait;
> > > int kswapd_max_order;
> > > enum zone_type classzone_idx;
> >
> > I think pg_data_t should include struct kswapd in it, as
> >
> > struct pglist_data {
> > .....
> > struct kswapd kswapd;
> > };
> > and you can add a macro as
> >
> > #define kswapd_waitqueue(kswapd) (&(kswapd)->kswapd_wait)
> > if it looks better.
> >
> > Why I recommend this is I think it's better to have 'struct kswapd'
> > on the same page of pg_data_t or struct memcg.
> > Do you have benefits to kmalloc() struct kswapd on damand ?
> >
>
> So we don't end of have kswapd struct on memcgs' which doesn't have
> per-memcg kswapd enabled. I don't see one is strongly better than the other
> for the two approaches. If ok, I would like to keep as it is for this
> verion. Hope this is ok for now.
>
My intension is to remove kswapd_spinlock. Can we remove it with
dynamic allocation ? IOW, static allocation still requires spinlock ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>