Re: [PATCH V4 02/10] Add per memcg reclaim watermarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:16 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:54:21 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are two watermarks added per-memcg including "high_wmark" and "low_wmark".
> The per-memcg kswapd is invoked when the memcg's memory usage(usage_in_bytes)
> is higher than the low_wmark. Then the kswapd thread starts to reclaim pages
> until the usage is lower than the high_wmark.
>
> Each watermark is calculated based on the hard_limit(limit_in_bytes) for each
> memcg. Each time the hard_limit is changed, the corresponding wmarks are
> re-calculated. Since memory controller charges only user pages, there is
> no need for a "min_wmark". The current calculation of wmarks is based on
> individual tunable low/high_wmark_distance, which are set to 0 by default.
>
> changelog v4..v3:
> 1. remove legacy comments
> 2. rename the res_counter_check_under_high_wmark_limit
> 3. replace the wmark_ratio per-memcg by individual tunable for both wmarks.
> 4. add comments on low/high_wmark
> 5. add individual tunables for low/high_wmarks and remove wmark_ratio
> 6. replace the mem_cgroup_get_limit() call by res_count_read_u64(). The first
> one returns large value w/ swapon.
>
> changelog v3..v2:
> 1. Add VM_BUG_ON() on couple of places.
> 2. Remove the spinlock on the min_free_kbytes since the consequence of reading
> stale data.
> 3. Remove the "min_free_kbytes" API and replace it with wmark_ratio based on
> hard_limit.
>
> changelog v2..v1:
> 1. Remove the res_counter_charge on wmark due to performance concern.
> 2. Move the new APIs min_free_kbytes, reclaim_wmarks into seperate commit.
> 3. Calculate the min_free_kbytes automatically based on the limit_in_bytes.
> 4. make the wmark to be consistant with core VM which checks the free pages
> instead of usage.
> 5. changed wmark to be boolean
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

some nitpick below.



> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h  |    1 +
>  include/linux/res_counter.h |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/res_counter.c        |    6 +++
>  mm/memcontrol.c             |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 5a5ce70..3ece36d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>
>  extern struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page);
>  extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p);
> +extern int mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int charge_flags);
>
>  static inline
>  int mm_match_cgroup(const struct mm_struct *mm, const struct mem_cgroup *cgroup)
> diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> index c9d625c..77eaaa9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ struct res_counter {
>        */
>       unsigned long long soft_limit;
>       /*
> +      * the limit that reclaim triggers.
> +      */
> +     unsigned long long low_wmark_limit;
> +     /*
> +      * the limit that reclaim stops.
> +      */
> +     unsigned long long high_wmark_limit;
> +     /*
>        * the number of unsuccessful attempts to consume the resource
>        */
>       unsigned long long failcnt;
> @@ -55,6 +63,9 @@ struct res_counter {
>
>  #define RESOURCE_MAX (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX
>
> +#define CHARGE_WMARK_LOW     0x01
> +#define CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH    0x02
> +
>  /**
>   * Helpers to interact with userspace
>   * res_counter_read_u64() - returns the value of the specified member.
> @@ -92,6 +103,8 @@ enum {
>       RES_LIMIT,
>       RES_FAILCNT,
>       RES_SOFT_LIMIT,
> +     RES_LOW_WMARK_LIMIT,
> +     RES_HIGH_WMARK_LIMIT
>  };
>
>  /*
> @@ -147,6 +160,24 @@ static inline unsigned long long res_counter_margin(struct res_counter *cnt)
>       return margin;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool
> +res_counter_high_wmark_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +     if (cnt->usage < cnt->high_wmark_limit)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool
> +res_counter_low_wmark_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
> +{
> +     if (cnt->usage < cnt->low_wmark_limit)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     return false;
> +}

I like res_counter_under_low_wmark_limit_locked() rather than this name.

Thanks for review. Will change this on the next post.

--Ying 

Thanks,
-Kame



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]