wt., 12 mar 2019 o 14:59 Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On 3/12/19 7:28 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The mm variable is set but unused. Remove it.
>
> It is used. Look further down for calls to set_pte_at().
>
> --
> Khalid
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/mprotect.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> > index 028c724dcb1a..130dac3ad04f 100644
> > --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> > unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
> > int dirty_accountable, int prot_numa)
> > {
> > - struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > pte_t *pte, oldpte;
> > spinlock_t *ptl;
> > unsigned long pages = 0;
> >
>
>
Oops, I blindly assumed the compiler is right, sorry for that. GCC
complains it's unused when building usermode linux. I guess it's a
matter of how set_pte_at() is defined for ARCH=um. I'll take a second
look.
Bart
