"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> [patch 1/4]: OK. I guess. Was this worth consuming our last PF_ flag? > > That was done based on request from Andrea and it also helps in avoiding > allocating pages from CMA region where we know we are anyway going to > migrate them out. So yes, this helps. > >> [patch 2/4]: unreviewed >> [patch 3/4]: unreviewed, mpe still unhappy, I expect? > > I did reply to that email. I guess mpe is ok with that? It would be nice to fold your explanation about DAX into the change log, so it's there for people to see. And I think my comment about initialising ret still stands. cheers
