Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [patch 1/5]: unreviewed and has unaddressed comments from mpe. > [patch 2/5]: ditto > [patch 3/5]: ditto > [patch 4/5]: seems ready > [patch 5/5]: reviewed by mpe, but appears to need more work That was mostly variable naming preferences. I like the christmas tree style not the inverted christmas tree. There is one detail about commit message, which indicate the change may be required by other architecture too. Was not sure whether that needed a commit message update. I didn't send an updated series because after replying to most of them I didn't find a strong request to get the required changes in. If you want me update the series with this variable name ordering and commit message update I can send a new series today. -aneesh
