On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 15:23 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 26-02-19 09:16:30, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/26/19 7:35 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 25-02-19 14:17:10, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > > When onlining memory pages, it calls kernel_unmap_linear_page(),
> > > > However, it does not call kernel_map_linear_page() while offlining
> > > > memory pages. As the result, it triggers a panic below while onlining on
> > > > ppc64le as it checks if the pages are mapped before unmapping,
> > > > Therefore, let it call kernel_map_linear_page() when setting all pages
> > > > as reserved.
> > >
> > > This really begs for much more explanation. All the pages should be
> > > unmapped as they get freed AFAIR. So why do we need a special handing
> > > here when this path only offlines free pages?
> > >
> >
> > It sounds like this is exact the point to explain the imbalance. When
> > offlining,
> > every page has already been unmapped and marked reserved. When onlining, it
> > tries to free those reserved pages via __online_page_free(). Since those
> > pages
> > are order 0, it goes free_unref_page() which in-turn call
> > kernel_unmap_linear_page() again without been mapped first.
>
> How is this any different from an initial page being freed to the
> allocator during the boot?
>
As least for IBM POWER8, it does this during the boot,
early_setup
early_init_mmu
harsh__early_init_mmu
htab_initialize [1]
htab_bolt_mapping [2]
where it effectively map all memblock regions just like
kernel_map_linear_page(), so later mem_init() -> memblock_free_all() will unmap
them just fine.
[1]
for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
base = (unsigned long)__va(reg->base);
size = reg->size;
DBG("creating mapping for region: %lx..%lx (prot: %lx)\n",
base, size, prot);
BUG_ON(htab_bolt_mapping(base, base + size, __pa(base),
prot, mmu_linear_psize, mmu_kernel_ssize));
}
[2] linear_map_hash_slots[paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT] = ret | 0x80;
