Re: [PATCH 0/4] forkbomb killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Minchan, Kamezawa-san,

> >> So whenever user push sysrq, older tasks would be killed and at last,
> >> root forkbomb task would be killed.
> >>
> >
> > Maybe good for a single user system and it can send Sysrq.
> > But I myself not very excited with this new feature becasuse I need to
> > run to push Sysrq ....
> >
> > Please do as you like, I think the idea itself is interesting.
> > But I love some automatic ones. I do other jobs.
> 
> Okay. Thanks for the comment, Kame.
> 
> I hope Andrew or someone gives feedback forkbomb problem itself before
> diving into this.

May I ask current status of this thread? I'm unhappy if our kernel keep 
to have forkbomb weakness. ;)
Can we consider to take either or both idea?



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]