Hi, Minchan, Kamezawa-san, > >> So whenever user push sysrq, older tasks would be killed and at last, > >> root forkbomb task would be killed. > >> > > > > Maybe good for a single user system and it can send Sysrq. > > But I myself not very excited with this new feature becasuse I need to > > run to push Sysrq .... > > > > Please do as you like, I think the idea itself is interesting. > > But I love some automatic ones. I do other jobs. > > Okay. Thanks for the comment, Kame. > > I hope Andrew or someone gives feedback forkbomb problem itself before > diving into this. May I ask current status of this thread? I'm unhappy if our kernel keep to have forkbomb weakness. ;) Can we consider to take either or both idea? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>