s/function/and/ on the subject? On 2/22/19 6:43 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > We have common pattern to access lru_lock from a page pointer: > zone_lru_lock(page_zone(page)) > > Which is silly, because it unfolds to this: > &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_zones[page_zonenum(page)]->zone_pgdat->lru_lock > while we can simply do > &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->lru_lock Heh, well spotted. > > Remove zone_lru_lock() function, since it's only complicate things. > Use 'page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock' pattern instead. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Thanks.
