Re: Banana Pi-R1 stabil

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Banana Pi-R1 stabil
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:36:22 -0800
Cc: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>, filbar@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7b20af72-76ea-a7b1-9939-ca378dc0ed83@wiesinger.com>
References: <7b20af72-76ea-a7b1-9939-ca378dc0ed83@wiesinger.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 09:04:57AM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> I guess it has something to do with virtual memory.

No, it's a NULL pointer dereference in the voltage regulator code.
Nothing to do with virtual memory.

References:
- Banana Pi-R1 stabil
  - From: Gerhard Wiesinger

Prev by Date: [RFC] percpu: decrease pcpu_nr_slots by 1
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/6] make memblock allocator utilize the node's fallback info
Previous by thread: Banana Pi-R1 stabil
Next by thread: Re: Banana Pi-R1 stabil
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux