> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:13:03AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:06 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:12 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro > > > > <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > After next year? All developers don't have to ignore compiler warnings! > > > > > > > > At least add vm_flags_t which is sparse-checked, just like we do with gfp_t. > > > > > > > > VM_SAO is ppc64 only, so it could be moved into high part, > > > > freeing 1 bit? > > > > > > My original series did use a type, I don't know what that was dropped, > > > it made conversion easier imho. > > > > Yes, I take Hugh's version because vm_flags_t is ugly to me. And arch > > dependent variable size is problematic. > > Who said it should have arch-dependent size? Ben's patch had arch-dependent size. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>