Hi Tejun, On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:07 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, Michal. > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:50:58PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Yeah, cgroup.events and .stat files as some of the local stats would > > > be useful too, so if we don't flip memory.events we'll end up with sth > > > like cgroup.events.local, memory.events.tree and memory.stats.local, > > > which is gonna be hilarious. > > > > Why cannot we simply have memory.events_tree and be done with it? Sure > > the file names are not goin to be consistent which is a minus but that > > ship has already sailed some time ago. > > Because the overall cost of shitty interface will be way higher in the > longer term. cgroup2 interface is far from perfect but is way better > than cgroup1 especially for the memory controller. Why do you think > that is? > I thought you are fine with the separate interface for the hierarchical events. https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128161201.GS50184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Is that not the case? Shakeel
