On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:17PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > But we are discussing the file name effectively. I do not see a long > term maintenance burden. Confusing? Probably yes but that is were the Cost on user side. > documentation would be helpful. which is an a lot worse option with way higher total cost. If you aren't against making it a mount option (and you shouldn't), I think that'd be the best use of time for both of us. Thanks. -- tejun