Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] psi: introduce psi monitor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:38 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:15:18PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > +                     atomic_set(&group->polling, polling);
> > +                     /*
> > +                      * Memory barrier is needed to order group->polling
> > +                      * write before times[] read in collect_percpu_times()
> > +                      */
> > +                     smp_mb__after_atomic();
>
> That's broken, smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() can only be used on
> atomic RmW operations, something atomic_set() is _not_.

Oh, I didn't realize that. After reading the following example from
atomic_ops.txt I was under impression that smp_mb__after_atomic()
would make changes done by atomic_set() visible:

/* All memory operations before this call will
* be globally visible before the clear_bit().
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit( ... );
/* The clear_bit() will be visible before all
* subsequent memory operations.
*/
smp_mb__after_atomic();

but I'm probably missing something. Is there a more detailed
description of these rules anywhere else?

Meanwhile I'll change smp_mb__after_atomic() into smp_mb(). Would that
fix the ordering?

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kernel-team" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux