On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:33:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > Does this series fix the "false positives" case I experienced on early > prototypes of uffd-wp? (getting notified about a write access although > it was not a write access?) Hi, David, Yes it should solve it. The early prototype in Andrea's tree hasn't yet applied the new PTE/swap bits for uffd-wp hence it was not able to avoid those fause positives. This series has applied all those ideas (which actually come from Andrea as well) so the protection information will be persisent per PTE rather than per VMA and it will be kept even through swapping and page migrations. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
