> >
> > -int show_available_funcs(const char *module, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > +int show_available_funcs(const char *elfobject, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > {
> > struct map *map;
> > int ret;
> > @@ -1990,9 +1990,9 @@ int show_available_funcs(const char *module, struct strfilter *_filter)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - map = kernel_get_module_map(module);
> > + map = kernel_get_module_map(elfobject);
> > if (!map) {
> > - pr_err("Failed to find %s map.\n", (module) ? : "kernel");
> > + pr_err("Failed to find %s map.\n", (elfobject) ? : "kernel");
>
> Hmm, these changes(module -> elfobject) are put back by the next patch.
> Could you check your patch stack?
>
In the next patch, we move "map =
kernel_get_module_map(module/elfobject)" to a new function
available_kernel_funcs(). For example: Even after the next patch,
show_available_funcs() still takes elfobject and not module. If you want
to avoid this, then we would have to either introduce the
available_kernel_funcs() in this patch Or we could merge this and the
next patch. Both those solutions dont look clean to me.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>