* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-04-04 19:15:11]: > (2011/04/01 23:37), Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Enhances -F/--funcs option of "perf probe" to list possible probe points in > > an executable file or library. A new option -e/--exe specifies the path of > > the executable or library. > > I think you'd better use -x for abbr. of --exe, since -e is used for --event > for other subcommands. Okay, > > And also, it seems this kind of patch should be placed after perf-probe > uprobe support patch, because without uprobe support, user binary analysis > is meaningless. (In the result, this introduces -u/--uprobe option without > uprobe support) > Okay, I can do that, Should we do the listing before or after the uprobe can place a breakpoint is arguable. > > > Show last 10 functions in /bin/zsh. > > > > # perf probe -F -u -e /bin/zsh | tail > > I also can't understand why -u is required even if we have -x for user > binaries and -m for kernel modules. > yes, for the listing we can certainly do without -u option. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>