On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:11 PM Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Le 08/01/2019 à 20:48, Andrew Morton a écrit : > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 07:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> In powerpc code, there are several places implementing safe > >> access to user data. This is sometimes implemented using > >> probe_kernel_address() with additional access_ok() verification, > >> sometimes with get_user() enclosed in a pagefault_disable()/enable() > >> pair, etc. : > >> show_user_instructions() > >> bad_stack_expansion() > >> p9_hmi_special_emu() > >> fsl_pci_mcheck_exception() > >> read_user_stack_64() > >> read_user_stack_32() on PPC64 > >> read_user_stack_32() on PPC32 > >> power_pmu_bhrb_to() > >> > >> In the same spirit as probe_kernel_read(), this patch adds > >> probe_user_read(). > >> > >> probe_user_read() does the same as probe_kernel_read() but > >> first checks that it is really a user address. > >> > >> ... > >> > >> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h > >> @@ -263,6 +263,40 @@ extern long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long count); > >> #define probe_kernel_address(addr, retval) \ > >> probe_kernel_read(&retval, addr, sizeof(retval)) > >> > >> +/** > >> + * probe_user_read(): safely attempt to read from a user location > >> + * @dst: pointer to the buffer that shall take the data > >> + * @src: address to read from > >> + * @size: size of the data chunk > >> + * > >> + * Returns: 0 on success, -EFAULT on error. > >> + * > >> + * Safely read from address @src to the buffer at @dst. If a kernel fault > >> + * happens, handle that and return -EFAULT. > >> + * > >> + * We ensure that the copy_from_user is executed in atomic context so that > >> + * do_page_fault() doesn't attempt to take mmap_sem. This makes > >> + * probe_user_read() suitable for use within regions where the caller > >> + * already holds mmap_sem, or other locks which nest inside mmap_sem. > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#ifndef probe_user_read > >> +static __always_inline long probe_user_read(void *dst, const void __user *src, > >> + size_t size) > >> +{ > >> + long ret; > >> + > >> + if (!access_ok(src, size)) > >> + return -EFAULT; > >> + > >> + pagefault_disable(); > >> + ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic(dst, src, size); > >> + pagefault_enable(); > >> + > >> + return ret ? -EFAULT : 0; > >> +} > >> +#endif > > > > Why was the __always_inline needed? > > > > This function is pretty large. Why is it inlined? > > > > Kees told to do that way, see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/986848/ Yeah, I'd like to make sure we can plumb the size checks down into the user copy primitives. -- Kees Cook