On 2019/01/07 22:37, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 07-01-19 22:07:43, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> On 2019/01/07 20:41, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Sun 06-01-19 15:02:24, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >>>> Michal and Johannes, can we please stop this stupid behavior now? >>> >>> I have proposed a patch with a much more limited scope which is still >>> waiting for feedback. I haven't heard it wouldn't be working so far. >>> >> >> You mean >> >> mutex_lock_killable would take care of exiting task already. I would >> then still prefer to check for mark_oom_victim because that is not racy >> with the exit path clearing signals. I can update my patch to use >> _killable lock variant if we are really going with the memcg specific >> fix. >> >> ? No response for two months. > > I mean http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181022071323.9550-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx > which has died in nit picking. I am not very interested to go back there > and spend a lot of time with it again. If you do not respect my opinion > as the maintainer of this code then find somebody else to push it > through. > OK, you haven't proposed an updated patch. Since nobody can test not-yet-proposed patch, you haven't heard it wouldn't be working so far.
