On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 10:47:06AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > I agree that currently the bottom-up allocation after the kernel text has > > issues with KASLR. But this issues are not necessarily related to the > > memory hotplug. Even with a single memory node, a bottom-up allocation will > > fail if KASLR would put the kernel near the end of node0. > > > > What I am trying to understand is whether there is a fundamental reason to > > prevent allocations from [0, kernel_start)? > > > > Maybe Tejun can recall why he suggested to start bottom-up allocations from > > kernel_end. > > That's from 79442ed189ac ("mm/memblock.c: introduce bottom-up > allocation mode"). I wasn't involved in that patch, so no idea why > the restrictions were added, but FWIW it doesn't seem necessary to me. I should have added the reference [1] at the first place :) Thanks! [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20130904192215.GG26609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Thanks. > > -- > tejun > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.